Greenhouse gas flux dynamics in fragmented river networks
Supervisors: Thibault Datry (UR RiverLY) et Vincent Chanudet (ED)
Doctoral School: Evolution, Ecosystems, Microbiology, Modelling (E2M2)
River networks are areas of disproportionate biogeochemical exchange compared to their occurrence in the landscape (Allen & Pavelsky, 2018). Rivers receive large amounts of terrestrially derived carbon that is subsequently stored, transformed, or ultimately transported to the ocean (Battin et al., 2008; Cole et al., 2007). Fragmentation by drying and damming, two of the most widespread forms of river fragmentation (Datry et al., 2014; Grill et al., 2019; Messager et al., 2021), may impact the production and evasion of greenhouse gases (GHGs), both locally, and at the network scale. At the local scale, CO2 and methane (CH4) fluxes from dry inland waters represent a significant component across freshwater ecosystems (Keller et al., 2020; Paranaíba et al., 2021). Organic matter (OM) and sediments accumulate in reservoirs, coupled with high water retention time and warm water temperatures, which can promote anaerobic conditions associated with denitrification and methanogenesis, and the generation of nitrous oxide (N2O) and CH4 (Wang et al., 2018). At the river network scale, rivers can be considered as meta-ecosystems made up of an aquatic continuum within a terrestrial matrix (Little et al., 2020). Fragmentation alters the lateral, vertical, and longitudinal flows of organisms, energy and resources across ecosystems (Cid et al., 2021; Datry et al., 2016). However, to date, limited research has been conducted on the effects of fragmentation on GHG dynamics of rivers at both the local and the network scales. The main objective of this thesis was to examine the effects of fragmentation by drying and damming on GHG dynamics in river networks. We tested the principle hypothesis that the spatio-temporal dynamics of drying and damming at the river network scale would be an important driver of GHG dynamics using a literature review, field studies, and a laboratory experiment (Figure 1).
Figure 1: The width of the arrows indicates the relative magnitude of process rates. Blue indicates lotic sections, yellow indicates dry sections, solid lines represent perennial sections, and dashed lines represent intermittent sections. We expect higher GHG fluxes in the upstream dry sediments, where organic matter inputs per unit area are typically higher (a). We anticipate that reservoirs in the main channel will have higher GHG fluxes per unit area due to warmer water temperatures compared to shaded upstream sections (b). The interactive additive effect of desiccation and dams may result in greater organic matter processing in the dry sections and reservoirs, leading to higher GHG emissions into the atmosphere (c). Source: Silverthorn et al., 2023 Freshwater Biology.
Our review of the literature revealed several key gaps, namely that studies about drying were lacking at the river network scale and in non-arid regions while studies about damming were lacking at small water retention structures. In the second chapter, I found that drying not only had a legacy effect on non-perennial reaches when they were flowing, but also a network-scale spatial effect. In the third chapter, I found that water temperature and allochthonous OM quantity influences CO2 and CH4 fluxes from mesocosms simulating isolated pools of non-perennial rivers. In the fourth chapter, I found that discontinuity, as a result of small impoundments, had seasonally-dependant network scale impacts on OM stocks, microbial-led decomposition, and CH4 fluxes, but not on CO2 fluxes nor on invertebrate-led decomposition. In sum, this thesis provides a compelling body of evidence attesting to the effects of fragmentation by drying and damming on GHG fluxes. Given the increasing occurrences of drying and damming in the face of global change (Döll & Schmied, 2012; Zarfl et al., 2015), the impacts of their fragmentation on river network biogeochemical dynamics at the river network scale, from isolated pools, and at small impoundments must be accounted for in global GHG budgets.
Cite the thesis
Teresa Silverthorn. Greenhouse gas flux dynamics in fragmented river networks. Hydrology. Université Claude Bernard - Lyon I, 2024. English. ⟨NNT : 2024LYO10040⟩. ⟨tel-05128075⟩
Access manuscript on HAL thèses
References
Allen, G. H., & Pavelsky, T. M. (2018). Global extent of rivers and streams. Science, 361(6402), 585–588.
Battin, T. J., Luyssaert, S., Kaplan, L. A., Aufdenkampe, A. K., Richter, A., & Tranvik, L. J. (2009). The boundless carbon cycle. Nature Geoscience, 2(9), 598–600.
Beaulieu, J. J., Tank, J. L., Hamilton, S. K., Wollheim, W. M., Hall, R. O., Mulholland, P. J., Peterson, B. J., Ashkenas, L. R., Cooper, L. W., Dahm, C. N., Dodds, W. K., Grimm, N. B., Johnson, S. L., McDowell, W. H., Poole, G. C., Valett, H. M., Arango, C. P., Bernot, M. J., Burgin, A. J., … Thomas, S. M. (2011). Nitrous oxide emission from denitrification in stream and river networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(1), 214–219. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1011464108
Chanudet, V., Gaillard, J., Lambelain, J., Demarty, M., Descloux, S., Félix-Faure, J., Poirel, A., & Dambrine, E. (2020). Emission of greenhouse gases from French temperate hydropower reservoirs. Aquatic Sciences, 82(3).
Cid, N., Erős, T., Heino, J., Singer, G., Jähnig, S. C., Cañedo-Argüelles, M., Bonada, N., Sarremejane, R., Mykrä, H., & Sandin, L. (2021). From meta-system theory to the sustainable management of rivers in the Anthropocene. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 20(1), 49–57.
Cole, J. J., Prairie, Y. T., Caraco, N. F., McDowell, W. H., Tranvik, L. J., Striegl, R. G., Duarte, C. M., Kortelainen, P., Downing, J. A., & Middelburg, J. J. (2007). Plumbing the global carbon cycle: Integrating inland waters into the terrestrial carbon budget. Ecosystems, 10(1), 172–185.
Datry, T., Pella, H., Leigh, C., Bonada, N., & Hugueny, B. (2016). A landscape approach to advance intermittent river ecology. Freshwater Biology, 61(8), 1200–1213. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12645
Döll, P., & Schmied, H. M. (2012). How is the impact of climate change on river flow regimes related to the impact on mean annual runoff? A global-scale analysis. Environmental Research Letters, 7(1), 014037.
Fuller, M. R., Doyle, M. W., & Strayer, D. L. (2015). Causes and consequences of habitat fragmentation in river networks. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1355(1), 31–51.
Grill, G., Lehner, B., Thieme, M., Geenen, B., Tickner, D., Antonelli, F., Babu, S., Borrelli, P., Cheng, L., Crochetiere, H., Ehalt Macedo, H., Filgueiras, R., Goichot, M., Higgins, J., Hogan, Z., Lip, B., McClain, M. E., Meng, J., Mulligan, M., … Zarfl, C. (2019). Mapping the world’s free-flowing rivers. Nature, 569(7755), Article 7755. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1111-9
Hotchkiss, E. R., Hal, R. O. J., Sponseller, R. A., & Butman, D. (2015). Sources of and processes controlling CO2 emissions change with the size of streams and rivers. Nature Geoscience, 8(9), 696–699. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2507
Keller, P. S., Catalán, N., von Schiller, D., Grossart, H.-P., Koschorreck, M., Obrador, B., Frassl, M. A., Karakaya, N., Barros, N., Howitt, J. A., Mendoza-Lera, C., Pastor, A., Flaim, G., Aben, R., Riis, T., Arce, M., Onandia, G., Paranaíba, J. R., Linkhorst, A., … Marcé, R. (2020). Global CO2 emissions from dry inland waters share common drivers across ecosystems. Nature Communications, 11(1), 2126. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15929-y
Kweku, D. W., Bismark, O., Maxwell, A., Desmond, K. A., Danso, K. B., Oti-Mensah, E. A., Quachie, A. T., & Adormaa, B. B. (2018). Greenhouse effect: Greenhouse gases and their impact on global warming. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, 17(6), 1–9.
Little, C. J., Rizzuto, M., Luhring, T. M., Monk, J. D., Nowicki, R. J., Paseka, R. E., Stegen, J., Symons, C. C., Taub, F. B., & Yen, J. (2020). Filling the Information Gap in Meta-Ecosystem Ecology.
Messager, M. L., Lehner, B., Cockburn, C., Lamouroux, N., Pella, H., Snelder, T., Tockner, K., Trautmann, T., Watt, C., & Datry, T. (2021). Global prevalence of non-perennial rivers and streams. Nature, 594(7863), 391–397.
Paranaíba, J. R., Aben, R., Barros, N., Quadra, G., Linkhorst, A., Amado, A. M., Brothers, S., Catalán, N., Condon, J., Finlayson, C. M., Grossart, H.-P., Howitt, J., Oliveira Junior, E. S., Keller, P. S., Koschorreck, M., Laas, A., Leigh, C., Marcé, R., Mendonça, R., … Kosten, S. (2021). Cross-continental importance of CH4 emissions from dry inland-waters. Science of the Total Environment, 814, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151925
Raymond, P. A., Hartmann, J., Lauerwald, R., Sobek, S., McDonald, C., Hoover, M., Butman, D., Striegl, R., Mayorga, E., Humborg, C., Kortelainen, P., Dürr, H., Meybeck, M., Ciais, P., & Guth, P. (2013). Global carbon dioxide emissions from inland waters. Nature, 503(7476), Article 7476. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12760
Richardson, J. S., Bilby, R. E., & Bondar, C. A. (2005). Organic matter dynamics in small streams of the Pacific Northwest. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 41(4), 921–934.
Rosa, L. P., dos Santos, M. A., Matvienko, B., dos Santos, E. O., & Sikar, E. (2004). Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Hydroelectric Reservoirs in Tropical Regions. Climatic Change, 66(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CLIM.0000043158.52222.ee
Silverthorn, T., López-Rojo, N., Foulquier, A., Chanudet, V., & Datry, T. (2023). Greenhouse gas dynamics in river networks fragmented by drying and damming. Freshwater Biology, 68(12), 2027–2041. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.14172
Silverthorn, T., López-Rojo, N., Sarremejane, R., Foulquier, A., Chanudet, V., Azougui, A., del Campo, R., Singer, G., & Datry, T. (2024). River network-scale drying impacts the spatiotemporal dynamics of greenhouse gas fluxes. Limnology and Oceanography, 69(4), 861–873. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.12531
Wang, F., Maberly, S. C., Wang, B., & Liang, X. (2018). Effects of dams on riverine biogeochemical cycling and ecology. Inland Waters, 8(2), 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/20442041.2018.1469335
Zarfl, C., Lumsdon, A. E., Berlekamp, J., Tydecks, L., & Tockner, K. (2015). A global boom in hydropower dam construction. Aquatic Sciences, 77(1), 161–170.
By browsing our site you accept the installation and use cookies on your computer.
Know more
About cookies
What is a "cookie"?
A "cookie" is a piece of information, usually small and identified by a name, which may be sent to your browser by a website you are visiting. Your web browser will store it for a period of time, and send it back to the web server each time you log on again.
Different types of cookies are placed on the sites:
Cookies strictly necessary for the proper functioning of the site
Cookies deposited by third party sites to improve the interactivity of the site, to collect statistics
Cookies strictly necessary for the site to function
These cookies allow the main services of the site to function optimally. You can technically block them using your browser settings but your experience on the site may be degraded.
Furthermore, you have the possibility of opposing the use of audience measurement tracers strictly necessary for the functioning and current administration of the website in the cookie management window accessible via the link located in the footer of the site.
Technical cookies
Name of the cookie
Purpose
Shelf life
CAS and PHP session cookies
Login credentials, session security
Session
Tarteaucitron
Saving your cookie consent choices
12 months
Audience measurement cookies (AT Internet)
Name of the cookie
Purpose
Shelf life
atid
Trace the visitor's route in order to establish visit statistics.
13 months
atuserid
Store the anonymous ID of the visitor who starts the first time he visits the site
13 months
atidvisitor
Identify the numbers (unique identifiers of a site) seen by the visitor and store the visitor's identifiers.
13 months
About the AT Internet audience measurement tool :
AT Internet's audience measurement tool Analytics is deployed on this site in order to obtain information on visitors' navigation and to improve its use.
The French data protection authority (CNIL) has granted an exemption to AT Internet's Web Analytics cookie. This tool is thus exempt from the collection of the Internet user's consent with regard to the deposit of analytics cookies. However, you can refuse the deposit of these cookies via the cookie management panel.
Good to know:
The data collected are not cross-checked with other processing operations
The deposited cookie is only used to produce anonymous statistics
The cookie does not allow the user's navigation on other sites to be tracked.
Third party cookies to improve the interactivity of the site
This site relies on certain services provided by third parties which allow :
to offer interactive content;
improve usability and facilitate the sharing of content on social networks;
view videos and animated presentations directly on our website;
protect form entries from robots;
monitor the performance of the site.
These third parties will collect and use your browsing data for their own purposes.
How to accept or reject cookies
When you start browsing an eZpublish site, the appearance of the "cookies" banner allows you to accept or refuse all the cookies we use. This banner will be displayed as long as you have not made a choice, even if you are browsing on another page of the site.
You can change your choices at any time by clicking on the "Cookie Management" link.